SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 34

A.M.AHMADI, M.FATHIMA BEEVI
Mangilal Vyas – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
ARUNESHVAR GUPTA, Badri Das Sharma, SURYA KANT SHARMA

JUDGMENT

Fathima Beevi, J.- These appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment and order dated 29-1-1987 of the High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench. The applications filed by the appellant under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the criminal proceedings in eight cases pending against him for the offence under Section 408 of the Indian Penal Code, were dismissed by the impugned judgment.

2. The appellant was the Manager of the Central Co-operative Bank, Jhunjhunu, during the period from February1, 1961 to June, 1963. After the special audit in the year 1963, prosecution was launched against the appellant for the embezzlement during this period. The appellant was alleged to have misappropriated various amounts received by him from different Sehkari Samities. The proceedings commenced in the year 1963 and eight cases are now pending trial. The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court was sought to be invoked for quashing these proceedings on the ground that the inordinate delay and the consequential harassment to the appellant required the exercise of such power to prevent the abuse of the process of the Court and to secure the ends of justice. T





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top