SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 228

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Jayanchandra Reddy and G N. Ray, JJ.
Rai Saheb & Ors. - Appellants
versus
State of Haryana - Respondent
Crl. Appeal No. 376 of 1992
Decided on 16.3.1993

Advocates:
Ayesha Khatri, Indu Malhotra, PREM MALHOTRA, Rajesh Batra, RENU GEORGE GUPTA, Shirin Jain, U.R.Lalit

Headnote:(i) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302/149/148 - Arms Act - Sections 25, 54 and S9 - TADA Act - Section 6 - Conviction for the offences under - Appeal - Enmity - Eye-witnesses being wife and son of the deceased - They traveled alongwith the deceased in the bus - All the accused getting into the bus and later attacking the deceased - Deceased died at the spot because of fire-arm injuries - F.I.R. given in a short and reasonable time - No inconsistency between direct evidence and medical evidence – No traces of false implication - Evidence of eye-witnesses wholly sufficient and trust-worthy - Convictions sustainable. (Para 8)

       (ii) Motive - Direct Witnesses - Motive not very important.

       (Para 5)

       (iii) Evidence - Death because of fire arm injuries - Eye witnesses being relation witnesses - Fact that other independent witnesses not examined - Not fatal to the prosecution case, when;

       Held: In a case of this nature and particularly in these areas where fife-arms are being used freely and indiscriminately, nobody would dare to come and give evidence. On the mere ground that the others who were in the bus, were not examined, the evidence of P.Ws. 5 and 6 cannot be rejected. Since they are interested witnesses their evidence has to be scrutinised with great care and caution. (para 5)

       (iv) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 149 and 34 - Murder Case - Occurrence in a bus All the five accused came in a body and boarded the bus - A-2 threw the deceased on ground - All the accused surrounded him - Two or three of them fired at the deceased - All the accused ran away together from the place of occurrence - Circumstances enough to attract section 149 or even section 34 of the Code.

JUDGEMENT

K. Jayanchandra Reddy, J. - This appeal is filed under section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA Act for short). There are five appellants. All of them were. tried for offences punishable under sections 302/149/148 & 404, I.P.C. and sections 25,27,54 & 59 of the Arms Act and section 6 of the TADA Act The Designated Court convicted all of them under section 148, I.P.C. and sentenced each of them to undergo one years R.I. and under sections 302/149 they were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. They were also convicted under sections 25, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act and section 6 of the TADA Act and sentenced to three years R.I. The sentences were directed to run concurrently. The prosecution case is as follows:

2. The accused, the deceased Sahi Ram and Principal witnesses belong to Village Chinder in Hissar District. The deceased was the Chairman of Land Mortgage Bank and he was having a gun licence also. Lakhpati, P.W. 5 was his wife and they had four sons. Praveen, P.W. 6 is one of their sons. Among the accused Rai Sahab, A-1 and Raja Ram, A-4 are brothers. Bhajan Lal, A-2 is the brother-in-law of A-1 and A-4 having married their sister. He belongs to a different village. Raja Ram, A-3 and Mohinder, A-5 are their associates. There was enmity between the accused and the deceased because of some incidents that took place earlier. It is alleged that one Manphool, uncle of A-3, received bullet injury. One of the sons of the deceased and others figured as accused in that case and the case was pending. On 11.5.1987, the day of occurrence, at about 8 a.m. the deceased went to Fatehabad and he carried his licenced gun with him. P.W. 5 went alongwith him to purchase clothes for her daughters and P.W. 6, the son of the deceased also followed them. At about 5.15 p.m. the deceased, P.Ws. 5 and 6 boarded the bus at Fatehabad Bus Stand for going back to the Village. In the bus they were sitting on the seat near the back window. Bhagirath rath and Ham residents of Village Chinder were also in the same bus. The bus stopped at the turning point of the factory located in Village Badopal. At that place all the five accused also boarded the bus. Accused Nos. 1,3 and 4 were at armed with guns and A-5 was armed with a p country-made pistol. The bus started and covered a distance of 3/4th of a kilometer towards Village Chinder. At that stage, Accused Nos. 1,2,4 and 5 came towards the deceased. In the meantime the bus stopped. A-2 took the deceased in his grip and E threw him on the ground from the back window of h the bus. In that process, the gun carried by the deceased also fell on the ground. Thereafter Accused Nos. l, 3 and 4 who were carry in guns with a them and A-5 who was carrying a pistol with him fired at the deceased with their respective weapons. The deceased died at the spot. The occurrence e was witnessed by P.Ws. 5 and 6 as well as Bhagi- a rath and Haru. A-2 took away the gun of the deceased and all the other accused left the place P.W. 6 and the other two persons went to the house a of the deceased to inform the other sons and members of his family. After about 1-1/2 hours Suresh, son, Jagdish, son-in-law and Khaili Ram, elder brother of the deceased arrived at the spot on a tractor. Then in the same tractor P.W. 5 alongwith Suresh went to Police Station, Fatehabad and gave the First Information Report Ex. PB to P.W. 13, Raj Singh, the Inspector of Police. P.W. 13 in the company of P.W.16, A.S.

I. Bhana Ram and a constable proceeded to the spot picking up a photographer P.W. 14, Satish on the way. They reached the scene of occurrence and found that the dead body was lying somewhere near the road and photographs of that place were taken. The Inspector collected the blood-stained earth and also recovered some metal pieces and other articles. He held the inquest and the dead body was sent for post-mortem. P.W. 9 Dr. A.S. Chaudhary, who conducted the post-mortem, found six rue-arm i














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top