SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 643

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.
M.M. Punchhi and K. Jayachandra Reddy, JJ.
Radha Ballabh & Ors. - Appellants
versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Crl. Appeal No. 768 of 1993 With
Crl. Appeal Nos. 19-94 & 23-94
All decided on 4.5.1995

Advocates:
A.P.Dhamija, A.S.PUNDIR, BIMAL ROY JAD, J.K.DAS, M.V.GOSWAMY, P.R.JAIN, S.K.JAIN, S.M.Jain, SANDHYA GOSVAMI, U.R.Lalit, VIPIN GOGIA

IMPORTANT POINT
The identification is only a part of the investigation and unless there are good reasons to doubt the proceedings the same cannot be rejected on mere suspicion that the accused might have been shown to the witnesses.

Headnote:(i) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 364, 365 and 386 - Convictions under - Appeal Circumstantial Evidence - School boy missing from 26.9.1975 and had never returned home Chance witnesses identified accused in identification parades as well as in court - Evidence of witnesses regarding movements of accused being natural and reliable - Communications sent by kidnappers to informant and his father - It is established that accused B was author of these letters under fictitious name - Contents of letters show that ransom was demanded and boy was kidnapped from lawful guardianship of his parents - Guilt of convicted accused established beyond all reasonable doubt Convictions upheld - Conviction of accused B altered from one u/s 386 to u/s 387.

       Held: The evidence of these witnesses amply establishes that Lalit was kidnapped from his house by Smt. Basanti and Radha Ballabh and they handed over the boy to accused Lalta Prasad, Raghuvir and Bissu and they in turn kept the boy in those two Villages and for longer time i.e. nearly 20 to 25 days in the house of accused Devi Ram and Har Charan. Thereafter the boy again was taken away by accused Bissu and whereabouts of the boy were not known after that. It is in this background that the letters received by P.W. l Exs. 4 to 9 assume importance. (Para 10)

       Further held: Since these are regular appeals, we have considered all the materials on record in detail and we are satisfied that the High Court has lightly held that the guilt of the convicted accused atleast is established beyond all reasonable doubt and they have been rightly convicted for the offences with which they were, charged. Learned counsel, however, pointed out that, the conviction of accused Bissu under Section 386 I.P.C. is not correct inasmuch as no ransom as such was extorted. We think that the correct conviction would be under Section 387I.P.C. Accordingly we alter the conviction of accused Bissu under Section 386 I.P.C. to one under Section 387 I.P.C. and award him sentence of seven years R.I. He was however convicted by the High Court under Section 364 I.P.C. also and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. Under the circumstances no interference is called for in it. (Para 13)

       (ii) Identification. No delay in holding identification parades - Witnesses identified accused in identification parades as well as in court - Unless there are good reasons to doubt proceedings, same cannot be rejected on mere suspicion that accused might have been shown to witnesses. (Para 9)

       

JUDGMENT

K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. - These three appeals arise out of a common judgment of Allahabad High Court. There are altogether seven appellants. They alongwith two others were tried for offences punishable under Sections 363, 364 and 365 read with 109, 368 and 386 read with 511 I.P.C. The trial court acquitted all of them. On an appeal by the State the High Court reversed the order of acquittal so far as the present appellants are concerned and convicted them under Sections 363 and 365 I.P.C. and sentenced each of them to undergo five years R.I. and they were also convicted under Section 364 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo ten years R.I. Appellant Bissu was also convicted under Section 364 I.P.C. but he was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and he was further convicted under Section 386 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo ten years R.I. The acquittal of the remaining two persons namely. Smt. Barfi and Ganga Prasad was confirmed. All the seven convicted accused namely Devi Ram, Har Charan, Radha Ballabh, Raghubir, Lalta Prasad, Bissu and Smt. Basanti have filed these three appeals.

2. The complainant Shyam Sunder, P.W.1 son of Mohan Lal is a resident of Mohalla Chuna Kankar in the city of Mathur. His son Lalit, aged about four years was during the relevant period a student of Gyandip School alongwith other children of the family. He used to go to the School by rikshaw and return by the same. On 26.9.1975 Lalit as usual had gone to the School with his sister and the cousins and returned home at about 12.30 P.M. At about 3.30 P.M. mother of P.W. l informed that Lalit was not traceable in the house and also he has not presented himself before the tutor who at that time was teaching other children in the ground floor hall of the house. On this P.W. l and other family members went in search of the boy. P.W. l gave information to the police Control Room which was recorded in the diary at about 5 P.M. The police searched at various places and also announcements were made on the loud speaker as well as on All India Radio and the newspapers. When all efforts failed they apprehended that the child was kidnapped. Thereupon P.W. 1 gave a written report on the basis of which a case was registered. P.W.l4 took up the investigation. He got the information on 6.11.1975 that P.Ws. 4, 5 and 10 had some know ledge of the facts relating to the kidnapping of the boy. P.W.14 recorded their statements which revealed that the child was kidnapped as a result of well-knit conspiracy. Accused Smt. Basanti was on visiting terms with the family of the complainant. On that day she was seen alongwith accused Radha Ballabh in the company of the missing boy at about 2.30 P.M. at the shop of Shankar Halwai on the outskirts of the Holi Gate. P.W. 2 Daya Shanker and one Jagmohan were eating kachauris in front of the said shop and they saw a woman and a man later identified as Smt. Basanti and Radha Ballabh coming to the said shop alongwith the boy and purchased 100 gms. of jalebi and gave the same to the boy. Thereafter they proceeded towards the lane leading to Antapara. The said two persons alongwith the boy reached the lane behind the temple. There P.Ws. 4 and 10 and one Gopal Jogi were present at the back stage of the temple and were talking. They saw three persons subsequently identified as accused Lalta Prasad, Raghuvir and Bissu, coming on a motor cycle and stopping there. Shortly they also saw a woman and a man with the boy and all the five of them had a talk amongst themselves. The woman asked the boy as to whether he would sit on the motor cycle and on the child responding affirmatively gave the boy to the person driving the motor cycle namely Lalta Prasad and told him to bring the boy after giving a ride. Thereafter the said three persons on the motor-cycle with the child proceeded towards Krishnapuri and Radha Ballabh and Smt. Basanti went towards the temple. According to the prosecution on the way the said persons riding the motor cycle w













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top