SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 402

B.K.MUKHERJEE, GHULAM HASAN, M.PATANJALI SASTRI
Budge Municipality – Appellant
Versus
R. Mukherjee – Respondent


N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR, J.

(1) PRATUI Chandra Mitra was the head clerk, and Phanindra Nath Ghose, the sanitary inspector of the Budge Budge Municipality, and they were also members of the Municipal Workers Union. On receipt of complaints against them for negligence, insubordination and in- discipline, the chairman of the muncipality suspended them on 13/7/1949, drew up separate proceedings, and called for an explanation within a specifled date. After the explanations were received, they were considered at a meeting of the commissioners held on 6/8/1949, and by a majority, the commissioners confirmed the order of suspension and directed the dismissal of the two employees. At the instance of the Municipal Workers union who questioned the propriety of the dismissal, the matter was referred by the State of West Bengal on 24/9/1949 to the industrial tribunal for adjudication under the Industrial Disputes Act. The tribunal made its award on 13/2/1950 that the suspension and punishment of the two employees were cases of victimisation, and It directed their reinstatement in their respective offices.

(2) THE municipality took the matter to the High court at Calcutta by means

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top