M. PATANJALI SASTRI, GHULAM HASAN, VIVIAN BOSE, N. H. BHAGWATI, S. R. DASS
Kikabhai Premchand, Kt. , Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax (Central), Bombay – Respondent
VIVIAN BOSE,J.:
(1) THIS is an appeal by an assessee against a judgment and order of the High court at Bombay delivered on a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate tribunal. The Bombay High court refused leave to appeal but the assessee obtained special leave from this court.
(2) THE appellant deals in silver and shares and a substantial part of his holding is kept in silver bullion and shares. His business is run and owned by himself. His accounts are maintained according to the mercantile system. It is admitted that under this system stocks can be valued in one of two ways and provided there is no variation in the method from year to year without the sanction of the Incometax authorities an assessee can choose whichever method he wishes. In this case, the method employed was the cost price method, that is to say, the cost price of the stock was entered at the beginning of the year and not its market value and similarly the cost price was again entered at the close of the year of any stock which was not disposed of during the year. The entries on the one side of the accounts at the beginning of the year thus balance those on the other in respect of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.