SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 83

P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.N.WANCHOO
Shapoor Fredoom Mazda – Appellant
Versus
Durga Prosad Chamaria – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.Ratnaparkhi, A.V.VISHWANATHA SASTRI, M.C.SETALVAD, P.K.CHATTERJI, W.S.Barlingay

P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAB, J.

(1) THIS appeal arises from a suit filed by respondent 1 Durga Prosad Chamaria against respondent 2 the heirs of John Carapiet Galstaun and others in which he sought to recover Rs. 4.00 p 64,213-5-3 on the mortgaes in suit. He had prayed for a preliminary mortgage decree according to 0. XXXIV, r. 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure and had asked for the appointment of a receiver in that behalf. The said mortgages were created by delivery of documents of title to immovable properties by the mortgagor John Carapiet Galstaun who died pending the suit. The properties mortgaged consisted of three items all of which are situated in Calcutta. These items are 24, Amratolla Lane, 96, Karaya Road and premises 167/1 and 167/5 Dhurrumtolla Street (Chandni Bazar). In the present appeal we are concerned with premises 167/1. Respondent 1s case was that he had advanced several amounts on seven different occasions to the mortgagor between 2/08/1926, and 27/11/1931. According to the terms of the transaction no specific time for payment of the mortgage dues had been fixed, and it was agreed that the monies advanced would become due and be repaid on demand being actually mad















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top