SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 150

M.HIDAYATULLAH, S.R.DASS, J.C.SHAH, S.K.DAS, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, J.L.KAPUR
Jadao Bahuji – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Committee Khandwa – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.MAHESHVARI, G.C.MATHUR, N.C.CHATTERJI

M.HIDAYATULLAH, J.

(1) THIS appeal, by certificate under Arts. 132(l) and 133(l)(c) of the Constitution, has been filed against an order of the High court at Nagpur dated 30/06/1955.

(2) THOUGH the facts necessary to decide the appeal lie within a comparatively narrow compass, the case itself has had a long and somewhat unique history. In July, 1922, the Municipal Committee, Khandwa, resolved to impose a tax on the trade of ginning and pressing cotton by means of steam, or mechanical process, and after sundry procedure, a notification was published on 25/11/1922 in the central Provinces and Berar Gazette, imposing the tax. Certain traders including the appellant, affected by the tax, filed suits seeking injunction against the Municipal Committee on the ground that the tax was invalid and illegal. Meanwhile, the Municipal Committee had served notices on the present appellant, and demanded and recovered the tax for 1923-24. The appellant then filed a second suit for refund of the tax paid by her on the ground that the imposition of the tax was illegal and ultra vires. The suits had varying fortunes in the courts in India, till they reached the Privy council. The Judicia















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top