SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 56

K.N.WANCHOO, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR
Vedaraneeswararswamy Devasthanam – Appellant
Versus
Dominion Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.VISHWANATHA SASTRI, B.K.B.Naidu, E.SUNDARALINGAM, GANAPATHY IYER, T.M.SEN, V.A.SEYID MUHAMMAD

P.B.GAJENDRA GADKAR, J.

(1) THIS appeal has been brought with a certificate issued by the Madras High Court and it arises out of a suit filed by the Managing Trustee of the appellant Sri Vedaraneeswararswamy Devasthanam against respondents 1 and 2 the Dominion of India and the Province of Madras respectively. In this suit the appellant claimed a declaration that the properties in suit belong to the appellant and asked for a direction against respondent 1 to put the appellant in possession of the same. A further direction was claimed against the said respondent calling upon it to account for and pay to the appellant mesne profits past and future and an alternative plea was also made by which the court was requested to determine the proper rent payable by the said respondent to the appellant. This claim has been rejected by the learned Subordinate Judge of Mayuram who tried the case and an appeal preferred by the appellant against the trial courts decision has likewise failed. That is why the appellant has come to this Court.

(2) ACCORDING to the appellant the suit properties which admeasure about 2,400 acres are situated in the village of Agastiyampalli

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top