SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 327

A.K.SARKAR, K.N.WANCHOO, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR
Hamdard Dawakhana Wakf – Appellant
Versus
Its Workmen – Respondent


Advocates:
B.R.L.Iyengar, Brij Bhusan Kishore, C.K.DAFTARY, K.B.MEHTA

Judgment

P.B.Gajendragadkar, J.

(1) THIS appeal by special leave aries oat of an industiral dispate .between the Appellant Hamdard Dawakhana Wakf and the respondents, its workmen. On 20/04/1961 the Chief Commissioner, Delhi, referred two items of dispute between the parties to the adjundication of the industiral tribunal at New Delhi. These items were in regard to the claim for additional bonna made by the respondents for the year 1969 and in regard to the grievance made by them in respect of the diamissal of Shamsul Zaman. The tribunal haa ordered that the appellant abonid pay to each and every workman of the Hamdard Dawakbana who worked In the calendar year 1959 additional bonaa equivalent to the one-third of his earninga by way of basic wagea for the said year. It haa also held that the order of dismissal passed against Shamaal Zaman was unjustified and so. It has directed the appellant to reinstate him in service without break In the continuity of his service. Back-wages daring the period of hia dlamlaal have, however, not been allowed to the workman. In the present appeal, the appellant ohallenges the correctness and propriety of both the directions given by the award.

(2











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top