SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 111

B. P. SINHA, J. C. SHAH, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR
Innamuri Gopalan – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.NAG, A.N.SINHA, A.RANGANADHAM CHETTY, N.C.CHATTERJI, P.D.MENON

N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, J.

(1) THE proper construction and legal effect of a notification under s. 9 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (A. P. VI of 1957) which for shortness we would call the Act, is the principal question that arises for consideration in this appeal by special leave in which the correctness of the decision of the High Court dismissing a Writ Petition filed by the appellants is challenged.

(2) SECTION 5 of the Act is the charging section under which dealers are liable to pay sales tax on their turnover. Under sub-s. (3) (a) of this section, read with Sch. II to the Act cotton textitle goods which was the commodity in which the appellants were dealing, were liable to tax at a single point. Section 9 of the Act enabled the State Government to exempt the tax leviable under the Act. In exercise of the power thus conferred a notification was issued on December 13, 1957, which read :

"IN exercise of the powers conferred by sub- Section (1) of Section 9 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, (Andhra Pradesh Act VI of 1957, hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Governor of Andhra Pradesh hereby exempt
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top