SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.C.Shah : J.R.Mudholkar : K.Subba Rao : Raghubar Dayal
Mohan Chowdhury: K.C.Dulia
Versus
Chief Commissioner, Union Territory Of Tripura: Chief Commissioner, Union Territory Of Tripura
Case No. : 15 of 1993
Date of Decision : 4/29/63
Advocates Appeared: Agrawal S.C. : Dhebar R.H. : Garg R.K. : Gupta S.V. : Prem D.R. : Ramamurthi M.K. : Rammurthi : Sachthey R.N. : Singh P.
B.P.SINHA, C. J.
(1) ON 26/10/1962, the President having been satisfied that a grave national emergency exists. whereby the security of India or any part of the territory thereof is threatened by the Chinese aggression, issued a Proclamation declaring the Emergency, under Art. 352 of the Constitution. That declaration of emergency was laid before both Houses of Parliament on 8/11/1962, and was approved by the Rajya Sabha on 13/11/1962, and by the Lok Sabha on 14/11/1962. After the Proclamation of Emergency, as Parliament was not in session, and as the President was satisfied that circumstances existed which rendered it necessary for him to take immediate action for exercise of the powers conferred by cl. (1.) of Art. 123 of the Constitution, he promulgated the Defence of India Ordinance (IV of 1962) on the same date-Octobcr 26, 1962. by s. 3 of the Ordinance, the central government has been empowered to make rules as appear to be necessary or expedient for securing the defence of India and civil defence, the public safety, the maintenance of, public order or the efficient conduct of military operations or for maintaining supplies and services essential to the life of the community by notification in the official gazette. In exercise of those powers, the central government promulgated the Defence of India Rules, 1962, by notification in the Official Gazette, Extraordinary dated 5/11/1962. The relevant portion of r. 30 is as follows: `The central government or the State government, if it is satisfied with respect to any particular person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of India and civil de fence, the public safety, the maintenance of public order, Indias relations with foreign powers, the maintenance of peaceful conditions in any part of India or the efficient conduct of military operations, it is necessary so to do, may make an order:- x x x (b) directing that he be detained; x x x During the operation of the Proclamation of Emergency the, President issued, on 3/11/1962, the following Order suspending the right to move any court for the enforcement of rights conferred by Arts. 21 and 22 of the Constitution `In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of article 359 of the Constitution, the President hereby declares that right of any person to move any court for the enforcement of the rights conferred by article 21 and article 22 of the Constitution shall remain snspended for the peried during which the Proclamation of Emergency issued under clause (1) of article 352 thereof on the 26/10/1962, is in force, if such person has been deprived of any such rights under the Defence of India Ordinance, 1962 (4 of 1962) or any rule or order made thereunder.`
(2) IN exercise of the power conferred by r. 30 aforesaid of the Defence of India Rules, the Chief Commissioner of Tripura issued an order of detention in respect of the petitioner on 20/11/1962
"NO. F. 22 (59)-PD/62 TRIPURA ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONEN. Agartala, 20/11/1962. ORDER WHEREAS, I am satisfied that Shri Bipul alias Mohan Chaudhry s/o Sri Bamala Charan Chaudhry of Sutaimura P.S. Bisalgarh should be detained with a view to preventing him/her from acting in any manner prejudiclal to the defence of India and Civil defence, public safety, the niaintenance of public order, Indias relation with foreign powers and the maintenance of peaceful condition in Tripura; Now, therefore, In exercise of the powers conferred by Rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules, 1962 read with sub-rule (11) of Rule 2 of the aforesaid Rules and all other powers enabling In that behalf, I hereby direct that the aforesaid person be detained in the central Jail at Agartala until further orders. Sd/. (S. P. Mukerief) Chlef Commissioner, Tripura,"
(3) BY a subsequent order dated 3/12/1962, of the Chief Commissioner Tripura, the petitioner was transferred from Agartala central jail to Hazaribagh central j
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.