SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 280

K.SUBBA RAO, S.M.SIKRI, J.C.SHAH
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Calcutta – Appellant
Versus
Jaipuria China Clay Mines Private LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.VISHWANATHA SASTRI, D.N.MUKHERJI, K.N.RAJAGOPAL SASTRI, R.Ganapathy Iyer, R.H.Dhebar, R.N.SACH

S.M.SIKRI,J.

(1) THIS is an appeal by certificate granted by the High court of Calcutta against its judgment in a reference made to it under s. 66 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as the Act.) The question referred to it by the Appellate tribunal, at the instance of the assessee, was as follows : `Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the unabsorbed depreciation of the past years should be added to the depreciation of the current year and the aggregate of the unabsorbed depreciation and the current years depreciation be deducted from the total income of the previous year relevant for the assessment year 1952-53.` The relevant facts and circumstances are as follows : The Income Tax Officer assessing the respondent, M/s Jaipuria China Clay Mines (P) Ltd. Calcutta, hereinafter referred to as the assessee, for the year1952-53 computed its total income at Rs. 14,041.00 before charging depreciation for that year. From that figure he deducted depreciation for the year amounting to Rs. 5,360.00, thus computing a profit of Rs. 8,681.00. From this figure he deducted an equivalent amount, i.e., Rs. 8,681.00, in respect of losses d








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top