SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 368

S.K.DAS, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, M.HIDAYATULLAH, A.K.SARKAR, J.L.KAPUR
Income Tax Officer, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Simplex Mills LTD. , Bombay – Respondent


Advocates:
J.B.DADACHAN, N.D.Karkhanis, O.C.MATHUR, R.J.KOLAG, R.N.SACH, Ravindra Narayan

A.K.SARKAR, J.

(1) THIS appeal is entirely without substance. It arises out of an application under Art. 226 of the Constitution made by the respondent assessee for a writ quashing an order of assessment made under s. 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922.

(2) THE respondent made" advance payment of tax under s. 18 A (1) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1952-53. On August 30, 1952, regular assessment for this year was made and a part of the tax paid in advance was thereupon found refundable to the respondent. Under the provisions of sub-s. (5) ofs. 18A, as it then stood, interest at a certain rate was payable on the amount paid in advance by an assessee under this section. Rupees 14,720-14-0 were found payable to the respondent under this provision and this sum was paid sometime in September 1952. On May 24, 1953, sub-s. (5) ofs. 18A was amended with effect from April 1, 1952. It is not necessary to refer to this amendment in detail and it is enough to state that under it the Government was to have paid to the respondent Rs. 9,404-5-0 instead ofRs. 14,720-14-0.

(3) ON March 18, 1957, a notice was issued under s. 34 (1) (b) stating that as










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top