Back
K.C.DAS GUPTA, J.C.SHAH, K.N.WANCHOO, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, S.R.DASS, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.L.KAPUR, M.HIDAYATULLAH
K. Venkataramiah – Appellant
Versus
A. Seetharama Reddy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal regarding election validity (Para 1) |
| 2. challenge on evidence consideration (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. objections to election validity (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. tribunal's evaluation of evidence (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. high court's admissibility of evidence (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. omission of reasons for evidence (Para 12 , 14) |
| 7. judgment on evidence necessity (Para 15 , 17) |
| 8. court's discretion in evidence admission (Para 16 , 19) |
| 9. consent effect on appeals (Para 20 , 21) |
| 10. appeal dismissal (Para 22) |
K.C.DAS GUPTA, J,
(1) THIS is an appeal against a judgment and order of the High court of Andhra Pradesh confirming. an order of the Election tribunal, Hyderabad by which the tribunal dismissed an election petition filed by the present appellant. By that petition this appellant sought a declaration that the election of three persons, the present respondent, Seetharam Reddy, one Anandam and M. Ataur Rahman be declared void and that he, the petitioner, be declared as duly elected to the Legislative council of the Andhra Pradesh from Telangana Graduates Constituency. In this appeal we are no longer concerned with the question of validity of elections of Mr. Anandam or M
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
