Back
K.C.DAS GUPTA, J.C.SHAH, K.N.WANCHOO, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, S.R.DASS, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.L.KAPUR, M.HIDAYATULLAH
K. Venkataramiah – Appellant
Versus
A. Seetharama Reddy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal regarding election validity (Para 1) |
| 2. challenge on evidence consideration (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. objections to election validity (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. tribunal's evaluation of evidence (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. high court's admissibility of evidence (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. omission of reasons for evidence (Para 12 , 14) |
| 7. judgment on evidence necessity (Para 15 , 17) |
| 8. court's discretion in evidence admission (Para 16 , 19) |
| 9. consent effect on appeals (Para 20 , 21) |
| 10. appeal dismissal (Para 22) |
K.C.DAS GUPTA, J,
(2) THE appellant challenges the decision of the High court mainly on the ground that in reaching its conclusion on the vital question of the age of Seetharam Reddy on the date of election the High court took into consideration evidence which was not legally available for such consideration.
(4) ALL these objections were rejected by the Election tribunal which accordingly dismissed the petition. On appeal, the High court confirmed the findings of the Election tribunal on all these points and dismissed the appeal.
(6) IT appears that a considerable amount of oral and documentary evidence was adduced before the tribunal on this question
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
