SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 88

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K.Sarkar : M.Hidayatullah : S.R.Dass
V.D.Talwar
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax, Bihar
Case No. : 673 of 1962
Date of Decision : 3/26/63
Advocates Appeared: Narasimhan M.S. : Sachthey R.N. : Sastri A.V.Viswanatha : Singh Gopal

Advocates:
A.V.VISHWANATHA SASTRI, Gopal Singh, M.S.NARASIMHAN, R.N.SACH

S.R.DASS, J.

(1) V.D.TALWAR, who was assessee before the taxing authorities and whose legal representatives on his death are appellants before us, was employed as the General Manager of Messrs J. K. Iron and Steel Company Ltd., Kanpur. The terms of his employment as agreed upon by the assessee and the Company were incorporated in an appointment letter dated 7/02/1946. A formal memorandum of agreement was also executed between the parties on 9/02/1946. The assessee actually joined the service of the company on 1/05/1946. According to the service agreement the pay of the assessee was fixed at Rs. 200.00 per month with an increment of Rs. 100.00 p.a. subject to certain deductions for income-tax, absence of duty etc., which need not be set out in detail for the purpose of this case. According to the agreement the period of service was for five years. Clauses (5) and (6) of the appointment -letter read`(5) Period of agreement of service to be five years. (6) Termination of service if within five years to be on notice of twelve months on either side or salary in lieu thereof. ` Clause (1) of the memorandum of the agreement dated 9/02/1946 said that the employee shall serve the employer faithfully and diligently for a term of five years from the date he joins, and cl. 21 read as follows : `If during the currency of this agreement, the employee desires to leave the services of the employers for any reasons whatsoever, he shall be at liberty to terminate the agreement by giving twelve calendar months notice in writing only after repaying to the employer joining money and all expenses if they have been allowed to the employee, and the employers shall have full power to take all necessary steps in order to enforce such payment. The employers may terminate the service of the employee by giving twelve calendar months notice in writing or (in the case of breach of any of the terms or conditions contained herein at any time without any notice) or paying any salary in lieu thereof.`

(2) WE have stated earlier that the assessee joined his post as General Manager on 1/05/1946. The services of the assessee were however terminated with effect from 31/08/1947. It is the admitted case of the parties that the services of the assessee were not terminated for any default or misconduct on the part of the assessee, but the services were terminated because the company did not want to continue the assessee in their employment. It is also the admitted case that no notice of twelve Months for the termination of the service was given by the company to the assessee as required by the contract, In lieu of the notice the company paid to the assessee on 12/09/1947 a sum of Rs. 18,096.10 which was the amount computed as salary for twelve months after deduction of income-tax at the source. The company calculated the salary for the twelve months at Rs. 25,200.00 and deducted therefrom the sum of Rs. 7,103/15/0 as income-tax. The assessee gave a stamped receipt to the company for having received Rs. 18,096/1/0 `in full and final settlement of all his claims and dues against the employer company.`

(3) IN making the assessment for the year 1948-1949 the Incometax Officer held that the sum of Rs. 25,200.00 was a revenue receipt of the assessee liable to be taxed under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 and rejected the claim of the assessee that the said sum was compensation for loss of employment and the tax amounting to Rs. 7,103/15/0 should be refunded to him. The assessee took an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner who held that the sum of Rs. 2,520.00 , though calculated on the basis of twelve times his monthly salary, was nothing but compensation for the loss of service and was therefore not taxable as income in the shape of salaries. Then there was an appeal to the Income-tax Appellate tribunal which reversed the finding of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and held that the amount of Rs. 25,200.00 paid to the assessee was really






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top