SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 327

A.N.GROVER, J.C.SHAH, V.RAMASWAMI
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
A. V. Narasimhalu – Respondent


Advocates:
LILY ISABLE THOMAS, NIREN DEY, R.N.SACH, V.A.SEYID MUHAMMAD

J.C.SHAH, J.

(1) A. V. Narasimhalu-hereinafter called "the plaintiff"- imported 43 reels of newsprint 13" width) under a Bill of Entry, dated July 15/07/1954. The width of the newsprint being less than 15" no import duty was payable under the Open General Licence. The Assistant Collector of Customs held that the, commodity imported fell within item 44 of the Customs Tariff and levied a duty of 331% ad valorem. The plaintiff paid the duty under protest, and applied for refund of the duty relying upon a decision of the High court of Madras in Writ Petition No. 402 of 1954, in which it was decided that newsprint of width less then 15" was exempt from duty. This application was rejected. An appeal to the Collector of Customs and a revision application to the central Board of Revenue were unsuccessful. The customs authorities rejected the claim on the ground that the claim not having been made within three months of the date of demand was barred under Section 40 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878.

(2) THE plaintiff then instituted an action in the City Civil court for a decree for Rs. 2,669.62 against the Union of India. The trial court decreed the claim holding that the claim w


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top