SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 352

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, I.D.DUA
Kallappa Sultana Patil By L. R. S. Dandu Kallappa Patil – Appellant
Versus
Balgonda Sultangouda Patil – Respondent


Advocates:
D.P.MOHANTY, R.B.DATAR, R.GOPAL KRISHNAN, S.M.PRASAD

VAIDIALINOAM C.A.,J.

(1) THIS appeal, by special leave, by defendants 1 to 4, is directed against the judgment and decree, dated 11/09/1961, of the Mysore High court in S. A. (B) No. 43 of 1956, confirming the decrees of the two subordinate courts granting a decree for possession in favour of the plaintiff-respondent.

(2) THE respondent instituted suit No. 1 of 1945, before the Second Class Sub-Judge at Chinchali, for recovery of possession of the suit lands. According to the plaintiff, the lands are Patilkiwatan Inam lands and he has been registered as Nawa Wala by Order No. 68, dated 30/03/1927, of the Revenue Authorities of the then Kolhapur State. The suit properties had gone in partition to one Maya Gouda, a member of the Patil family. Maya Gouda died about 35 or 40 years ago and his widow Jakkawwa was in possession of the lands till the date of her death on 16/08/1943. The plaintiffs further case was that though Mays Gouda and Jakkawwa had a daughter Bayabai, the 7th defendant in the suit, the latter could not inherit the Inam properties under the law obtaining in Kolhapur State. Therefore the line of Maya Gouda has become extinct and the plaintif














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top