SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 313

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.N.Grover : J.C.Shah : V.Ramaswami
State Bank Of India
Versus
Rajendra Kumar Singh
Case No. : 82 of 1965
Date of Decision : 10/25/68
Advocates Appeared: De Niren : Misra B.C.

Advocates:
B.C.MISHRA, NIREN DEY

Headnote:(1) Criminal P.C, 1898 - S. 520- notice to the parties adversely affected-should be issued before an order is passed.

       It is true that the statute does not expressly require a notice to be issued, or a hearing to be given to the parties adversely affected. But though the statute is silent and does not expressly require issue of any notice, there is in the eye of law a necessary implication that the parties adversely affected should be beard before the Court makes an order for return of the seized property. AIR 1962 SC 1110, (1963) 2 WLR 935 & (1863) 14 CB NS 180 relied on.[Para 4]

       (2) Criminal P.C., 1898 - Ss. 517 & 520- discretion under-should be exercised according to proper legal principles-person giving currency notes to the accused for ‘duplication' and person receving the notes in regular course of business without knowledge of the offence-later is entitled to receive back the notes.

       (3) Criminal P. C., 1898 – S. 517 - right to passess-currency notes-right to possess when arises.

       (4) Legal Maxims-Nemo dat quod nan habet-exception to this maxim - property in coins and currency notes – when passes.

       It is true that sections 517 & 520 of the Code of Criminal Procedure confer a discretion on the High Court as regards the disposal of the property seized or produced before it or regarding which any offence was said to have been committed, but the discretion bas to be exercised according to proper principles.

       The respondents No. 1 and 2 gave the disputed currency notes to the accused ‘for the criminal purpose of duplication’. The appellant Bank from whom the notes were seized obtained them in the normal course of its business and without any knowledge or suspicion of their having been involved in the commission of any offence. The High Court ordered that the notes be returned to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

       Held: It is not correct to say that respondents No. 1 and 2 are equally innocent, because respondents No. 1 and 2 had admittedly handed over the currency notes to respondent No. 3 ‘for the criminal purpose of duplication’.

       The High Court was in error in directing the return of the currency notes to respondents No. 1 and 2. The reason is that the property in coins and currency notes passes by mere delivery and it is the clearest exception to the rule nemo dat quod non habet. This exception was engrafted in the interest of commercial necessity. But the exception applies only if the transferee takes in good faith for value and without notice of a defect in the title of the transferor. The appellant Bank had the 'right to possess' the currency notes within the language of section 517 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (1863) 14 CB NS 257 relied on. [Paras 6 & 7]

V.RAMASWAMI, J,

(1) THIS appeal is brought from the order of the High court of Madhya Pradesh dated 5/04/1963 in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 135 of 1962 under section 520 of the Code of Criminal Procedure directing the return of 21 currency notes of the denomination of Rs. 1,000.00 each to respondents Rajendra Kumar Singh and Virendra Singh.

(2) THE currency notes of the total value of Rs, 21,000.00 were seized by the Madhya Pradesh Police from the Beawar Branch of the State Bank of India in the course of an investigation of a case under S. 420, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code registered in P.S. Thuko Ganj, Indore City as Crime No. 113 of 1961 against Kishan Gopal, the third respondent. It appears that the third respondent had come into possession of a sum of Rs. 1,50,000.00 in government currency notes by cheating the first and second respondents. The currency notes seized from the appellant were said to be part of the property obtained by Kishan Gopal by the commission of the said offence. The case of the appellant was that it had come into possession of the said currency notes in the usual course of its business partly through the Bank of Rajasthan Limited and partly through the Mahalaxmi Mills Company Limited without any knowledge that the said currency notes had been the subject matter of an offence. In the proceedings that followed on the investigation of the said case, the accused persons including the third respondent were acquitted by the court of the Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Indore in Sessions Case No. 3 of 1962 by an order made on 24/04/1962. In the course of the trial, the appellant made an application under section 517 (1 ) of the Code of Criminal Procedure asking for delivery of the aforesaid 21 currency notes to it on the ground that the said currency notes had been seized by the police from the appellant and that the appellant was an innocent third party who had received the said notes without any knowledge or suspicion of their having been involved in the commission of an offence. By his order dated 24/04/1962 the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Indore allowed the application and directed that the currency notes should be returned to the appellant. Subsequently, an appeal was filed to the High court by the State of Madhya Pradesh being Criminal Appeal No. 205 of 1962. The appeal was allowed and the High court set aside the order of acquittal of the third respondent and convicted him under S. 420, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment. The first respondent, Rajendra Kumar Singh, made an application to the High court asking for delivery of the currency notes as they belonged to him and the second respondent and as they had been deprived of the said property by the third respondent by the commission of the aforesaid offence. The application was allowed by the High court by its order dated 5/04/1963 and the currency notes were ordered to be handed over to the first and the second respondents. The relevant portion the order of the High court reads as follows :-`Now the bulk of the recovered property consists of government currency notes either of the denomination of rupees one thousand each or money obtained after the tender of one thousand rupee notes by Kishan Gopal. The position of the recovered money in short is this :-- 1. 37, one thousand rupee Rs.

notes were recovered from

the pillow of accused Kishan

Gopal after bis arrest

amounting to: 87,000

2. Money directly traceable to

one-thousand rupee notes

recovered from Dayabhai

P. W. 52, with whom it

was deposited by accused

Kishan Gopal and Mst. 59,000

3. Tulsabai Money recovered from Mst.

Tulsabai the sister of accuseds concubine. 10,000

4. Money in Beawar Bank consisting

of two drafts of ten

thousand each; one in the

name of accused Kishan

Gopal and the other in the

name of Rukmanibai, his

witness for which the accused

tendered twenty one

(sic) thousand rupee notes

and on










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top