SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 385

A.N.GROVER, J.C.SHAH, V.RAMASWAMI
R. V. M. Neeladri Rao – Appellant
Versus
Board Of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SUBBA RAO, A.V.RANGAM, A.V.Velayudhan Nair, D.NAVANJU, P.RAM REDDY

A.N.GROVER, J.

(1) THIS is an appeal by certificate from a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court given in a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by the appellants.

(2) THE facts may be stated. The previous Maharajah of the impartible estate of Pithapuram in East Godavari District granted a lease on June 22, 1887, in favour of his third wife late Rani Subbayyamma Bahadur in respect of lands in various villages covering an area of acres 2669.65 cents. The Rani executed a will on 8/11/1914, bequeathing all her property including the lease-hold rights to the first appellant and on her death he succeeded to her estate. On 10/12/1956, the first appellant transferred his lease- hold rights in acres 2519.63 cents to the second appellant and reserved to himself the rights in and over the remaining area of acres 150.52 cents. The third appellant is an assignee from the second appellant.

(3) ON the enactment of the Madras Estate (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) (Act XXVI of 1948), hereinafter called the Act, the title of which was changed to the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 19















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top