SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 174

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.S.Hegde : R.S.Bachawat : S.M.Sikri
N.Swain
Versus
B.K.Mohapatra
Case No. : 2064 of 1968
Date of Decision : 4/11/69

S.M.SIKRI, J.

(1) THIS appeal was heard along with State of orissa v. B. K. Mohapatra, in whichwe have just delivered judgment and is against the same judgment which was appealed against in that appeal. This appeal is by certificate granted by the High court of orissa, under Article 133(l)(c) of the Constitution, to two officers N. Swain and S. S. Padhi who were not made parties in that writ petition filed by B. K. Mohapatra but they were allowed to intervene in the writ petition before the High court.

(2) IT seems to us that an intervener is not entitled to appeal against the judgment and order of the High court and the High court should not have granted certificate to them under Article 133(l)(c). In such cases the officers who intervened before the High court should, if they wanted to be heard, have applied to the Supreme court for intervention in the appeal filed here.

(3) IN the result we discharge the certificate and dismiss the appeal. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top