SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 545

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
K. D. Kamath And Company – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax, Bangalore – Respondent


C.A. VAIDIALINGAM, J.

(1) THIS appeal, by special leave, raises the question whether the deed, dated 20/03/1959, and marked Ex. A is an Instrument of Partnership on the basis of which the appellant firm is eligible to be granted registration under S. 26-A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter to be referred as the Income-tax Act).

(2) THE appellant is a firm consisting of six partners and the partnership was constituted under the document, dated 20/03/1959. The business of the partnership, as recited in the deed, is stated to have been carried on in partnership from 1/10/1958. The partnership was registered under the Indian, Partnership Act; 1932, (hereinafter to be referred as the Partnership Act) on or about August 11, 1959. For the assessment year 1959-60, corresponding to the previous year ending 31/03/1959,-the appellant filed an application to the Income-tax Officer, A Ward, Dharawar under Section 26-A for registration of the partnership in the name of M/s. K. D. Kamath and Company. The Income-tax Officer, by his order, dated 28/09/1960. declined to grant registration on the ground that there was no genuine partnership brought into existence by the dee



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top