SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 62

A.N.GROVER, J.C.SHAH, K.S.HEGDE
Ramachandra Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Arunschalathammal – Respondent


J.C.SHAH, J.

(1) ONE Arumugam had three sons,Thanu, Shanmugam and Sankaran, and a daughter Ramalakshmi. Shanmugam died in 1942 and his estate devolved upon his daughter Chidambarathammal. By virtue of S. 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, she acquired, when that Act was brought into force an absolute interest in the estate inherited by her from Shanmugam. Chidambarathammal died in February, 195 7, when she was a minor and unmarried. Arunachalathammal, one of the daughters of Ramalakshmi Ammal, sister of Shanmugam, commenced an action in the court of the District Munsiff for partition and spearate possession of her 1 /24th share out of the estate of Chidambarathammal. The claim was resisted by the sons of Thanu anil Sankai an-brothers of Shanmugam. The Trial court decreed the claim and that decree was confirmed in second appeal to the High court of Madras.

(2) IN this appeal Mr. Chagla, for the appellant, contends that Arunachalathammal was under the Hindu Succession Act not entitled to a share in the estate of Chidambarathammal. The relevant provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 may be noticed. S. 16(1) of the Act provides:

"THE property of a female Hindu dyin




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top