SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 59

J.C.SHAH, K.S.HEGDE, A.N.GROVER
Naruthappan Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Veeramany Chettiar – Respondent


J.C. SHAH, J.

(1) ON May 13, 193G, Arumugam Chettiar and his five sons Madlirayyan. Sivathanu, Subbayyan. Sankaran and Bhagavathy executed a deed of partition of the property belonging to their joint family. In the last paragraph of the deed it was provided that Madurayyan, Sivathanu, Subbayyan and Bhagavathy "shall offect alienations among themselves in respect of the property falling to their respective shares in case any alienations are to be effected . On 2/05/1959, Subbayyan transferred his share of the property to one Veeramany for Rs. 2,500.00. Madurayyan and Bhagavathy then filed a suit in the court of the Principal District Munsiff, Nagarcoil, against the purchaser Veeramany for a decree declaring that they had a "right of pre-emption" inrespect of the property sold by Subbayyan and to obtain possession of that property from Veeramany on payment of Rs. 2,500.00. To this suit Subbayyan Chettiar and his son Arumugam Chettiar were impleaded as partie. To this suit Sivathanu was not impleaded as a party. The Trial court dismissed the suit holding that the plaintiffs were estopped by reason of their conduct from claiming to purchase property pursuant to the covenant in t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top