SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.N.Grover : J.C.Shah : K.S.Hegde
Century Spinning And Manufacturing Company Limited
Versus
Ulhasnagar Municipal Council
Case No. : 2130 , 2131 of 1969
Date of Decision : 2/27/70
Advocates Appeared: Bhartari P.C. : Dadachanji J.B. : Daphtary C.K. : Dapthary C.K. : Gakhott H.R. : Gurusahani N.H. : Keswani N.H. : Mathur O.C. : Nair S.P. : Nayar S.P. : Sharma B.D. : Shroff Suwh A.
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Indian Companies Act, 1913 – Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1967 – Section 105 and S. 136 to 144 – Assessment – Collection – Recovery octroi – High court of Bombay dismissed in limine a petition filed by Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. – Companyfor the issue of a writ restraining the respondent Muncipality from enforcing the provisions of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act 40 of 1965 relating to the levy, assessment, collection, recovery octroi and in particular Section 105 and S. 136 to 144 thereof,, and from enforcing the Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1967, and from acting upon resolutions passed by the Municipal council, and from levying, assessing, collecting, recovering or taking any other step under the Act, rules or the resolutions, and for an order restraining the Municipality of Ulhasnagar from levying, assessing, collecting any octroi on the goods imported by the Company within the limits of the Municipal council for a period of seven years from the date of its first imposition. – With special leave, the Company has appealed against the order rejecting the petition – Held, Public bodies are as much bound as private individuals to carry out representations of facts and promises made by them, relying on which other persons have altered their position to their prejudice. – Obligation arising against an individual out of his representation amounting to a promise may be enforced ex contractu by a person who acts upon the promise : when the law requires that a contract enforceable at law against a public body shall be in certain form or be , executed in the manner prescribed by statute, the obligation may be if the contract be not in that form be enforced against it in appropriate cases in equity – If court nascent democracy is to thrive different standards of conduct for the people and the public bodies cannot ordinarily be permitted. – A public body is, in our judgment, not exempt from liability to carry out its obligation arising out of representations made by it relying upon which a citizen has altered his position to his prejudice – Merely because a question of fact is raised, the High court will not bejustified in requiring the party to seek relief by the somewhat lengthy, dilatory and expensive process by a civil suit against a public body – Order passed by the High court is set aside and the case is remanded to the High court with a direction that it be readmitted to the file and be dealt with and disposed of according to law. – High court will issue rule to the Municipality and the State and dispose of the petition. – Court recommend that the case may be taken up for early hearing. – Court had during the pendency of the appeal in this court made an order restraining the levy of octroi duty – Civil Appeal Dismissed
J.C. SHAH, J.
(1) THE High court of Bombay dismissed in limine a petition filed by the Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd.-hereinafter called The Companyfor the issue of a writ restraining the respondent Muncipality from enforcing the provisions of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act 40 of 1965 relating to the levy, assessment, collection, recovery octroi and in particular Section 105 and S. 136 to 144 thereof,, and from enforcing the Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1967, and from acting upon resolutions passed by the Municipal council, dated 9/09/1968 and Sep 13/09/1968, and from levying, assessing, collecting, recovering or taking any other step under the Act, rules or the resolutions, and for an order restraining the Municipality of Ulhasnagar from levying, assessing, collecting any octroi on the goods imported by the Company within the limits of the Municipal council for a period of seven years from the date of its first imposition. With special leave, the Company has appealed against the order rejecting the petition.
(2) THE Company was incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913. It set up its factory in 1956, within the limits of village Shahad, Taluka Kalyan, on a site purchased from the State of Bombay, and within an area known as the Industrial Area. No octioi duty was then payable in respect of goods imported by the Company into the Industrial Area for use in. the manufacture of its products. On 30/10/1959, the government of Bombay issued a notification announcing its intention to constitute a Municipality for certain villages, including the Industrial Area. The Company and other manufacturers who had set up their plants and factories objected to the proposed constitution of the Municipal area. On 20/09/1960, the atate of Maharashtra (successor to the State of Bombay) published a notification constituting with effect from 1/04/1960 the Municipality including the area in which the Industrial Area was included. Representations were then made by the Company and other Manufacturers for excluding the Industrial Area from the Ulhasnagar Muncipal District Area. On 27/04/1962 the government of Maharashtra (the new State of Maharashtra having been constituted under the Bombay Reorganization Act, 1960) proclaimed that the Industrial Area be excluded from the Municipal jurisdiction. The District Municipality then made a representation to the government of Maharashtra that the proclamation, dated 27/04/1962, be withdrawn by the government. The Municipality agreed to exempt the existing factories, viz. tlie Company and other manufacturers whose factories were then existing in the Industrial Area from payment of octroi for a period of seven years from the date of levy of octroi and for exempting new industrial units from payment of octroi for a similar period from the date of establishment. The (government of Maharaibtra acceded to the request of the Municipality to retain the Industrial Area within the local limits of the Municipality.
(3) ON 24/08/1963, the District Municipality passed a resolution to implement the agreement. It was resolved that the Municipality "agrees to give a concession to the existing factories by exempting them from the payment of octroi for a period of 7 years from the date of levy of octroi tax and by exempting new factories from the payment of the octroi tax for a period of 7 years from the date of their establishment as recommended by the government of Maharashtra".
(4) ON 31/10/1963, the government of Maharashtra issued a notification withdrawing the proclamation, dated 27/04/1962, and the Industrial Area became part of the Ulhasnagar Municipal District. Relying upon the assurance and undertaking given by the Municipality the Company claims that it had expanded its activities and commenced manufacturing new products by setting up additional plant which it would not have done "but for the concessions given, assurances and representations made and a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.