SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 338

A.N.GROVER, K.S.HEGDE
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bihar And Orissa, Patna – Appellant
Versus
Dalmia Jain And Company LTD. – Respondent


K.S.Hegde, J.

(1) ALL these appeals by certificate are by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bihar and orissa, against the same assessee, namely, Dalmia Jain & Co. Ltd. The point that arises for decision in these appeals is whether the loss incurred by the assessee in the sale of some shares held by it is a trading loss or a capital loss. There is no dispute that the assessee did incur loss by the sale of those shares. It is established that the assessee was dealing in shares. It is also established that in the previous years, such losses were given deduction too while computing the total income of the assessee. The tribunal as well as the High court have concurrently come. to the conclusion that the loss in question is trading loss. The question whether, a particular loss is a trading loss or a capital loss is primarily a question of fact. It is not the case of the department that in arriving at its decision, the tribunal has taken into consideration any irrelevant consideration or failed to take into consideration any relevant consideration. Hence, there is no room for interference by this court. In the result, these appeals are dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top