SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 462

I.D.DUA, A.N.RAY
R. M. Malkani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
B.D.SHARMA, M.C.BHANDARE, M.M.Mistry, S.P.NAIR, VINIT KUMAR

A.N.RAY, J.

(1) THIS is an appeal by cetificate from the judgement, dared October 8 and 9, 1969, of the High court at Bombay convicting the appellant under Sectioni 161 and 385 of the Indian penal Code. The High court confirmed the substantive sentence to simple imprisomment for six months under Section. 161 of the Indian Penal Code and simple imprisonment for three months under S. 385 of the Indian Penal Code. In addition, the high court imposed on the appellant a fine of Rs. 10,000.00 and in default of payment of fine, further simple imprisoment for six months.

(2) THE appeliant was at the curcial time the coroner of bombay The prosecution case was as follows Jagdish prasad Ramnarayan Khandwal was admited to the nursing home of a Gynaecologist Dr. Adatia on 3/05/1964 Dr. Adatia diagnosed the caes as acute appendicitis. Dr. Aditya kept the patient under the observation. After 24 hires the condition of the patient became serious. Dr. Shantilal J. Mehta was called his diagnosis was acute appendiate operation . Dr. Aditya performed the operation . The appendix, according to Dr. Aditya had become gangrenous. The patient developed paralysis to the ileum he

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top