SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.R.Khanna : I.D.Dua : K.S.Hegde : P.Jaganmohan Reddy
Rameshwar Prasad Bagla
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Lucknow
Case No. : 1718 of 1969
Date of Decision : 9/27/72
Advocates Appeared: Das Bhagirath : Dhingra S.K. : Hirajee S.K. : Mishra S. : Puri H.K. : Sachthey R.N. : Sharma B.D.
Income Tax Act – Sections 12, 66 – Income Tax – Capital Gain – Acquisition of stock-in-trade. – On the first question the answer of the High court was that there was no material for the finding that the shares in question were purchased by the assessee with a view to acquire the managing agency and control of the company. It was further held that the shares constituted the stock-in-trade of the assessee. – In view of the above, the High court held in answer to question No. (ii) that the prints made by the sale of shares could not constitute capital gain chargeable to income-tax under S. 12-B of the Act. – Appellant-company was a dealer in shares and securities and carried on business as managing agents for some companies. – In order to acquire the managing agency of a textile-mill, the appellantcompany purchased from Sassoon David & Co., who were the managing agents thereof, 1,507 shares of the mill at Rs. 2,321-8-0 per share at a time when the market price of the shares was Rs. 1,610.00. – Remaining 1,000.00 shares of the mill held by Sassoon David & Go. were acquired by the directors of the appellant-company. – Two months later the appellant-company sold 400 of those shares at the loss of Rs. 1,78,438.00. – Said loss was claimed as a trading loss. – Question arose in this context whether the purchase of shares could be regarded as acquisition of stock-in-trade. – Held, Court isof the view that the answer given by the High court to question No. (i) was not correct. – There was material for the finding that the shares in question had been purchased by the assessee with aview to acquire the managing agency and control of the India United Mills Ltd., and that,the shares did not constitute the stock-in-trade of the assessee. – Court find that it is the common case of the panties that if the shares in question are held to be not stocic-in-trade of the assessee, in that case the profits made on the sale of those shares would constitute capital gain chargeable to income-tax under S. 12-B of the Act. – Indeed, this is what was prayed for by the assessee in his letter, dated 30/03/1949. – Court is of the opinion that the profit made on the sale of those shares constituted capital gain chargeable to income-tax under S. 12-B of the Act. – Court would answer question No. (ii) accordingly. – Order Accordingly
H.R.Khanna, J.
(1) THIS appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of Allahabad High court whereby that court answered the follow* ing two questions in a reference made to it under S. 66(2) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) :
(I) Whether there was material for the finding that the shares in question were purchased by the assessee with a view to acquire the managing agency and the control of the company or the shares constituted his stock-in-trade ?
(II) Even if the shares in question did not constitute the stock-in-trade of the assessee, whether the profit made on the sale of shares did not constitute capital gain chargeable to income-tax under S. 12-B of the Act ?"
ON the first question the answer of the High court was that there was no material for the finding that the shares in question were purchased by the assessee with a view to acquire the managing agency and control of the company. It was further held that the shares constituted the stock-in-trade of the assessee. In view of the above, the High court held in answer to question No. (ii) that the prints made by the sale of shares could not constitute capital gain chargeable to income-tax under S. 12-B of the Act.
(2) THE matter relates to assessment year 1947-48, the relevant previous year for which was the .Dassera year 2002-2003 corresponding to the period from 16/10/1945 to Oct 5/10/1946.
(3) RAMESHWAR Prasad Bagla, the assessee-appellant, is a partner of firm Agarwal & Co. having one-sixteenth share in the firm. Agarwal & Co., consisted of six groups of partners, viz. (1) Morarka Group, (2) Khetan Group, (3) Saksaria Group, (4) Poddar Group, (5) Baga Group, and (6) Kantilal Nahalchand. The Bagla Group consisted of the assessee and his brother.
(4) M/S. E. D. Sassoon & Co. Ltd., were the managing agents of the India United Mills Ltd. The latter is a public Limited Company and was engaged in the manufacture of textiles in Bombay. Large clocks of ordinary and deferred shares in the India United Mills Ltd., were held by M/s. E. D. Sassoon & Co. Ltd. and its associates. In 1943, there were negotiations between M/s. E. D. Sassoon & Co. Ltd., and one of the partners ofAgarwal & Go. Those negotiations resulted in an agreement, dated 26/01/1945, under which M/s. E. D. Sassoon & Co. Ltd., agreed to assign the managing agency of the India United Mills Ltd. to Agarwal & Co., with effect from 1/12/1943. The consideration for the sale of managing agency was Rs. 57,80,000.00 Agarwal & Co., also agreed to purchase 16,80,000.00 ordinary shares of the face-value of Rs. 10.00 each and twenty lakh deferred shares of rupee one each of the India United Mills Ltd. The total issued shares of the India United Mills Ltd., were twenty lakh ordinary shares of Rs. 10.00 each and fifty lakh deferred shares of rupee one each. The price for this big lot of shares was fixed at Rs. 3,37,20,000.00 calculated at the rate of Rs. 16/8.00 for an ordinary share and Rs. 3.00 for a deferred share.
(5) AT the time when the above mentioned large block of shares of the India United Mills Ltd. was agreed to be acquired, Agarwal & Co. was not in a position to pay for five lakh ordinary shares involving an outlay of Rs. 82,50,000.00. Those five lakh shares were purchased by Ramkumar Shivehandrai of Poddar Group of partners in Agarwal & Co., to the extent of three lakh shares. The remaining two lakh shares were purchased by Khetan Group of partners. The two groups, viz., Poddar and Khetan Groups held the five lakh shares on behalf of Agarwal & Co. till 1944. The understanding with Poddar and Khetan Groups was that those shares would be taken up by the partners of Agarwal & Co. at the same price. In January, 1945, the aforesaid five lakh ordinary shares were taken over by Agarwal & Co. from Poddar and Khetan Groups. The assessee appellant was entitled with reference to his holding in Agarwal & Co. to 31,25
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.