SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 128

H.R.KHANNA, K.S.HEGDE
Commissioner Of Income Tax, W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Calcutta Discount, Company LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
D.N.GUPTA, M.C.CHAGLA, R.N.SACH, S.C.Manchanda, S.S.P.MAYOR, Sachin Chandra Chawdhury, T.A.Ramachandran

K.S.Hegde, J.

(1) THIS is an appeal by. certificate. It arises from the decision of the Calcutta High court in a reference under S. 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (to be hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). Three questions of law were referred to the High court for ascertaining its opinion. Those questions are:

"(1) Whether, in view of the fact that the tribunals order dated 22/07/1964, was an interlocutory order, the tribunal was competent to entertain an application purported to be under S. 66(1) of tho Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, in respect of such order?

(2) If the answer to question no. 1 above be in the affirmative, whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal exercised its discretion judicially in not allowing the applicants petition for raising the additional grounds?

(3) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal summarily on the grounds stated in its appellate order dated 3/09/1964?"

(2) THE: High court answered the first question in favour of the assessee and came to the conclusion that it was unnecessary to answer the remaining two q


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top