SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 270

P.S.KAILASAM, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
American Express International Banking Corporation – Appellant
Versus
S. Sundaram – Respondent


(1) WE have heard learned Counsel for both the sides in the special leave petition. One of the main arguments advanced by Mr. Pai, on behalf of the petitioner the American Express International Banking Corporation, is that, in view of the directions issued by the Reserve Bank of India under S. 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, it is not open to the petitioner-Bank to pay in excess of six per cent the bonus to the respondents and the other employees even if such bonus is payable under an agreement between the Bank and its employees. We would like to clarify that, in view of me judgment dated 30/03/1977 of the Industrial tribunal against which the petitioner has filed the special leave petition, the directions, jf any, issued by the Reserve Bank cannot stand in the way of petitioner in making the payment of bonus in excess of six per cent. The tribunal has held that the Bank is liable to pay the bonus in accordance with the agreement and, therefore, the directions of the Reserve Bank can no longer be operative as impediment in the payment of bonus. The special leave petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top