SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 37

N.L.UNTWALIA, P.S.KAILASAM
Subhendu Prosad Roy Choudhury – Appellant
Versus
Kamala Bala Roy Choudhury – Respondent


N.L.UNTWALIA, J.

(1) -THIS is a landlords appeal by special leave. They had filed a petition in the year 1958 in the court of the Munsif at Alipore under S. 5 of the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949 as it then stood after serving a notice on the tenant-respondents to quit in accordance with S. 4. The ground for eviction was as provided in S. 3 (iv) of the said Act. The application was allowed by the Munsif but was dismissed on appeal by the tenants by the subordinate Judge. He took the view that the notice given on the 8/01/1958 was not given on behalf of all the co-owner landlords as the name of one of the minor co-owner landlord was not mentioned at the foot of the notice. The landlords challenged the order of the subordinate Judge in the Calcutta High court but were unsuccessful. Hence this appeal.

(2) WE have examined the original notice dated 8/01/1958. In the paper-book as printed there is a slight inaccuracy. On examination of the original notice what is clear is that the notice was from and on behalf of all the co-owner landlords including all the minors as mentioned at the top of the notice. At the foot signatures were appended. Sobhandu Prosad



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top