SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 192

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, P.S.KAILASAM, R.S.SARKARIA
Munshi Ram – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Committee, Chheharta – Respondent


Advocates:
HARDEV SINGH, SHOBHA DIXIT, URMILA KAPUR, V.C.MAHAJAN

R.S.Sarkaria, J.

(1) THIS appeal by special leave is directed against a judgment, dated 3/10/1968, of the High court of Punjab and Haryana.

(2) THE facts leading to this appeal are that the appellants are partners of a firm, Bharat Industries, Chheharta.

(3) BY a notification dated 15/05/1946, the Chheharta Municipal Committee levied a profession tax under S. 61(l)(b) of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911. Initially, the tax was Rs.15.00 per annum and was levied on all the partners of the said firm.

(4) BY a notification, dated 4/07/1958, the annual tax for trade, profession or calling for the owner of a factory registered under the Indian Factories Act, was raised to Rs.200.00 per annum and each of the six partners of the said firm were assessed to annual tax of Rs.200.00 by the Municipal Committee.

(5) ON 30/10/1960, the appellants filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant-Committee from realising the profession tax demanded by it per letters 15 to 20, dated 31/05/1960, amounting to Rs. 1,200.00.

(6) THE appellants challenged the validity of the assessment contending that construed in the light of the defi






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top