R.S.PATHAK, R.S.SARKARIA, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Katyani Dayal: K. K. Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Chinnappa Reddy, J.
(1) SEVERAL hundred Railway Engineers who should have been busy elsewhere, building bridges, laying-or doubling tracks and so on have found themselves in the corridors of this court in pursuit of the loaves of career. Quite a contingent was present in court anxiously watching the proceedings and listening with rapt attention to every word that fell from counsel and judge. One could not help wondering whether this multi-tiered,multi-varna service-system was itself not productive of a career neurosis, destructive of the very efficiency which it sought to achieve.
(2) IN this case, as in most other service matters that reach this court, the questions which arise for, consideration relate to classification, confirmation, seniority, promotion etc., questions which appear to agitate the minds of the members of all services. Administrators seeking to find solutions to some of the problems very soon discover that their solutions are no more than illusions and have created other problems. First one party and then another party, all seek the protection of the court. The court is no expert administrator. Lacking expertise, lacking the administr
relied on : B.N.Nagarajan v. State of Mysore
State of Kerala M K Krishnan Nair
State of Punjab v. Joginder Singh
Kishori Mohanlal v. Union of India
State of J and K V. Triloki Nath Khosa
Roshan Lal Tondon v. Union of India
Mervyn Coutinho v. Collector of Customs, Bombay
Mohd Shujat Ali v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.