SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 10

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.Varadarajan : M.Fazal Ali Syed
Aitha Chander Rao
Versus
State Of A.P.
Case No. : 337 of 1975
Date of Decision : 1/8/81

Headnote:

Probation of Offenders Act – Section 12Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 304-A - Appeal Against conviction - Special leave - Appeal by special leave is directed against judgment of High court of Andhra Pradesh affirming conviction of appellant under S. 304-A Indian Penal Code for 2 years RI and a fine of Amount - After having gone through judgment of courts below court do not find any reason to interfere with merits of appeal - Only question that may be considered is if it is a proper case in which appellant may be released on probation - Sessions Judge had found that there was some amount of contributory negligence on part of appellant and having regard to peculiar circumstances of this case court think it is eminently a fit case in which appellant may be released on probation – Held, Court therefore suspend sentence of imprisonment only maintaining fine imposed on appellant - Instead release him on probation of good conduct under S. 4 of Probation of Offenders Act and S.361 CrPG - Appellant shall execute a bond for maintaining peace and good behaviour for a period of one year and if he violates any condition of bond he may be called upon to surrender and serve remaining part of sentence - Out of fine of amount - Entire amount shall be paid as compensation to widow and legal heirs of deceased - Appeal is disposed of

(1) THIS appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High court of AndhraPradesh affirming the conviction of the appellant under S. 304-A, Indian Penal Code for 2 years RI and a fine of Rs. 500.00. After having gone through the judgment of the courts below, we do not find any reason to interfere with the merits of the appeal. The only question that may be considered is if it is a proper case in which the appellant may be released on probation. The Sessions Judge had found that there was some amount of contributory negligence on the part of the appellant and having regard to the peculiar circumstances of this case we think it is eminently a fi-t case in which the appellant may be released on probation. We therefore suspend the sentence of imprisonment only maintaining the fine imposed on the appellant and. instead release him on probation of good conduct under S. 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act and S. 361, CrPG. The appellant shall execute a bond of Rs. 1,000.00 for maintaining peace and good behaviour for a period of one year and if he violates any condition of the bond, he may be called upon to surrender and serve the remaining part of the sentence. Out of the fine of Rs. 500.00, the entire amount shall be paid as compensation to the widow and legal heirs of the deceased.

(2) AS the appellant has been released on probation, this may not affect his service career in view of S. 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act. The appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid observations.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top