SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 10

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, A.V.VARADARAJAN
Aitha Chander Rao – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


(1) THIS appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High court of AndhraPradesh affirming the conviction of the appellant under S. 304-A, Indian Penal Code for 2 years RI and a fine of Rs. 500.00. After having gone through the judgment of the courts below, we do not find any reason to interfere with the merits of the appeal. The only question that may be considered is if it is a proper case in which the appellant may be released on probation. The Sessions Judge had found that there was some amount of contributory negligence on the part of the appellant and having regard to the peculiar circumstances of this case we think it is eminently a fi-t case in which the appellant may be released on probation. We therefore suspend the sentence of imprisonment only maintaining the fine imposed on the appellant and. instead release him on probation of good conduct under S. 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act and S. 361, CrPG. The appellant shall execute a bond of Rs. 1,000.00 for maintaining peace and good behaviour for a period of one year and if he violates any condition of the bond, he may be called upon to surrender and serve the remaining part of the sentence.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top