SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 481

K.SUBBA RAO
Sone Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
V.J.Francis

(1) NOTICE under Order X, Rule 6(3) and (4) of the Supreme court Rules, 1966, has been issued to the Advocate returnable on 24/11/1981. Counsel for the petitioners Mr V.J. Francis has prayed that the matter may be taken up today itself. Hence the matter has been taken up today.

(2) THE appeal above mentioned was heard by the court and after hearing the counsel for the appellants and counsel for the respondent the Court delivered judgment on 3/04/1981 dismissing the appeal. The appellant has filed on 28/04/1981 an application for rehearing of the appeal in which he inter alia prayed that the judgment of this court may be rescinded and the parties may be permitted to make submissions through counsel. Counsel has been informed that since the appeal has been disposed of after hearing the counsel for the parties, no application for rehearing lies in the matter and he may, if so, be advised to file a review petition under the Rules of the court. He has not cured the defect but he has filed a letter staling that the application may be listed before the court and that the Registry may leave the matter to the court to decide whether the circumstances mentioned by him in the p



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top