SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 134

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.C.Gupta : Baharul Islam
Malkiat Singh
Versus
State Of Punjab
Case No. : 209 of 1981
Date of Decision : 2/27/81

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - It appears that in this case the accused have entered into a compromise with persons injured in the occurrence out of which this appeal arises - Taking note of this fact and following the decision of this court in High court in effect reduced sentence of imprisonment of the two of appellants before it to periods already undergone by them but in case of other two who are appellants before us a different order was made –Held, Court think that ends of justice would be met if sentences of imprisonment passed on appellants before us are also reduced to periods undergone by them – Court do not disturb the sentences of fine imposed on the appellants - Appeal is disposed of

(1) IT appears that in this case the accused have entered into a compromise with the persons injured in the occurrence out of which this appeal arises. Taking note of this fact and following the decision of this court in Ram Pujan v. State of U.P., the High court in effect reduced the sentence of imprisonment of the two of the appellants before it to the periods already undergone by them, but in the case of the other two who are appellants before us a different order was made. We think that the ends of justice would be met if the sentences of imprisonment passed on the appellants before us are also reduced to the periods undergone by them. We do not disturb the sentences of fine imposed on the appellants. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top