SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(SC) 228

D.A.DESAI, R.B.MISRA
Ramji Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
B.B.Singh, B.S.Chauhan

(1) SPECIAL leave is granted.

(2) APPELLANT original accused 2 and 3 were convicted for an offence under S. 325 read with S. 34 of the Indian Penal Code and each of them was sentenced to R.I. for 1 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 200.00 in default to undergo R.I. for three months. Both of them were also convicted for an offence under S. 324 read with S. 34, Indian Penal Code and each of them is sentenced to suffer R.I. for one year. Both of them are further convicted for an offence under S. 323 read with S. 34. Indian Penal Code and each of them is sentenced to suffer R.I. for six months. Substantive sentences are directed to run concurrently. Original accused 1 was given the benefit of the provisions of Probation of Offenders Act and he was ordered to execute a bond for a period of two years to be of good behaviour. That period has long since expired.

(3) WHEN the special leave was taken up for hearing today, Dr. Chauhan. appeared for the appellants and Mr B.B. Singh. learned counsel appeared for the original injured complainant. Both drew our attention to an affidavit dated 1/11/1982 filed by the original injured complainant, Nasib Singh, in which he has stat


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top