O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, A.C.GUPTA
Tharayil Sarada – Appellant
Versus
Govindan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
In this case, the High Court in second appeal allowed the plaintiff to amend the plain to include a prayer for partition of the disputed property and straightway passed a preliminary decree declaring plaintiffs 1/4th before us, it is contended, and in our opinion rightly, that the High Court before making the decree should have given an opportunity to the defendant to file an additional written statement. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned judgment and the decree and send the case back to the High Court to dispose of the appeal in accordance with law, after giving the defendant an opportunity to file an additional written statement. We express no opinion on the correctness or otherwise of the findings recorded by the High Court on other points. There will be no order as to costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.