SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A C Gupta, O Chhinnappa Reddy
THARAYIL SARADA AND ANOTHER, APPELLANTS
VERSUS
GOVINDAN AND ANOTHER, RESPONDENTS.
Civil Appeal No. 987 of 1981, decided on March 16, 1981.
Constitution of India,1950 - Prayer for partition - Disputed property – High Court in second appeal allowed plaintiff to amend plain to include a prayer for partition of disputed property and straightway passed a preliminary decree declaring before us it is contended and in court opinion rightly that High Court before making decree should have given an opportunity to defendant to file an additional written statement - Held, Set aside impugned judgment and decree and send the case back to High Court to dispose of appeal in accordance with law after giving defendant an opportunity to file an additional written statement - Court express no opinion on correctness or otherwise of findings recorded by High Court on other points - Second appeal allowed
JUDGMENT
In this case, the High Court in second appeal allowed the plaintiff to amend the plain to include a prayer for partition of the disputed property and straightway passed a preliminary decree declaring plaintiffs 1/4th before us, it is contended, and in our opinion rightly, that the High Court before making the decree should have given an opportunity to the defendant to file an additional written statement. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned judgment and the decree and send the case back to the High Court to dispose of the appeal in accordance with law, after giving the defendant an opportunity to file an additional written statement. We express no opinion on the correctness or otherwise of the findings recorded by the High Court on other points. There will be no order as to costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.