SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(SC) 240

D.A.DESAI, R.B.MISRA
Gopalji Jha Shastri – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
D.GOVERDHAN CHARY, D.P.MUKHERJI

(1) THREE appellants were members of the Managing Committee of Bihar Khadi Gramodyog Sangh. In that capacity they were prosecuted for committing an offence under S. 31(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate took cognizance of the offence against the aforementioned persons who are appellants in this appeal. Thereupon, the appellants moved the High court of Judicature at Patna in Cr.W.J.C. No. 93 of 1973 for quashing the order taking cognizance of the offence, it was contended before the High court that Bihar Khadi Gramodyog Sangh is not an industry within the meaning of S. 2(/) of the Industrial Disputes Act and therefore, the action of the appellants could not be said to be in contravention of S. 33 so as to be punishable under S. 31(1). A division bench of the High court by its judgment declined to interfere with the order of learned Magistrate and dismissed the writ petition. Hence this appeal by special leave.

(2) THE point raised in this appeal would be covered by the decision of the Constitution bench composed of seven Judges of this court in Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa. The wide sweep of expression i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top