SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(SC) 240

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.A.Desai : R.B.Misra
Gopalji Jha Shastri
Versus
State Of Bihar
Case No. : 231 of 1976
Date of Decision : 12/14/82
Advocates Appeared: Goburdhan D. : Mukherjee D.P.

Advocates:
D.GOVERDHAN CHARY, D.P.MUKHERJI

Headnote:

Industrial Disputes Act - Section 33 - Special leave - Committing an offence - Cognizance - Appellants were members of the Managing Committee of Bihar - In that capacity they were prosecuted for committing an offence under S. 31(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate took cognizance of offence against aforementioned persons who are appellants in this appeal - Thereupon appellants moved High court of Judicature at Patna in for quashing order taking cognizance of offence it was contended before the High court that is not an industry within the meaning of S. 2(/) of Industrial Disputes Act and therefore action of appellants could not be said to be in contravention - Held, Appeal would be covered by the decision of the Constitution bench composed of seven Judges of this court in Water Supply & Sewerage Board - Wide sweep of expression industry as interpreted therein will comprehend Bihar and therefore following decision it must be held that is an industry within meaning of expression of S. 2(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Consequently contention raised in this appeal must fail - Appeal dismissed.

(1) THREE appellants were members of the Managing Committee of Bihar Khadi Gramodyog Sangh. In that capacity they were prosecuted for committing an offence under S. 31(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate took cognizance of the offence against the aforementioned persons who are appellants in this appeal. Thereupon, the appellants moved the High court of Judicature at Patna in Cr.W.J.C. No. 93 of 1973 for quashing the order taking cognizance of the offence, it was contended before the High court that Bihar Khadi Gramodyog Sangh is not an industry within the meaning of S. 2(/) of the Industrial Disputes Act and therefore, the action of the appellants could not be said to be in contravention of S. 33 so as to be punishable under S. 31(1). A division bench of the High court by its judgment declined to interfere with the order of learned Magistrate and dismissed the writ petition. Hence this appeal by special leave.

(2) THE point raised in this appeal would be covered by the decision of the Constitution bench composed of seven Judges of this court in Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa. The wide sweep of expression industry as interpreted therein will comprehend Bihar Khadi Gramodyog Sangh and, therefore, following the decision it must be held that Bihar Khadi Gramodyog Sangh is an industry within the meaning of the expression of S. 2(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Consequently, the contention raised in this appeal must fail. That being the only point, the appeal {ails and is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top