SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 183

D.A.DESAI, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Ram Lal Chandan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
E.C.AGARWAL, M.S.Gupta, S.DIXIT

ORDER

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ Petition No. 38 of 1968 and connected petitions in which the constitutional validity of Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 was challenged. The High Court upheld the validity of the impugned Act. Hence this appeal be certificate under Article 133(1)(c) of the Constitution.

2. By sheer passage of time, the point raised herein has lost significance. The question of constitutional validity of the impugned legislation has been examined by a Constitution Bench of this Court in Ram Chandra Kailash Kumar & Co. v. State of U.P. ((1980) 3 SCR 104 : 1980 Supp SCC 27 : AIR 1980 SC 1124). This Court upheld the constitutionality of the impugned legislation. There was some lingering doubt as to the validity of some rule which aspect is also concluded by the decision of this Court in Vishnu Dayal Mahendra Pal v. State of U.P. ((1975) 1 SCR 376 : (1974) 2 SCC 306 : AIR 1974 SC 1489). Nothing thereafter remains for our consideration.

3. Mr. M. S. Gupta, learned counsel who appeared for the appellant urged that in the High Court the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top