SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 330

R.S.PATHAK, A.N.SEN
Shashi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, A.K.SHARMA, A.N.PAREKH, A.P.CHATTERJEE, A.Subhashini, A.V.RANGAM, ANIL SHARMA, ASHOK SHARMA, B.R.AGRAWAL, Badri Das Sharma, C.V.SUBBA RAO, D.D.SHARMA, D.GOVERDHAN CHARY, D.N.Mishra, D.P.MOHANTY, D.P.MUKHERJI, F.S.NARIMAN, G.N.Rao, G.S.CHATTERJEE, GOPAL SUBRAMANIUM, H.S.PARIHAR, K.M.BHATT, K.N.BHATT, L.N.Sinha, M.K.Dua, M.M.ABDUL KHADER, M.M.KSHATRIYA, M.S.K.Shastri, M.V.GOSWAMY, M.VIRAPPA, MIRA MATHUR, NANGAPPA GANAPATHY, NARAYAN NETTAR, O.C.MATHUR, P.G.GOKHALE, P.N.PURI, P.R.MRIDUL, P.RAM REDDY, PRAVIN KUMAR, PREM MALHOTRA, R.H.Dhebar, R.N.Poddar, R.P.KAPUR, R.S.SHROFF, RAMESHWAR NATH ROY, Ranjan Dwivedi, S.A.SHROFF, S.BALAKRISHNAN, S.K.MEHTA, S.K.Sinha, S.N.KACKAR, S.QAMARUL HASAN, S.RAVINDER BHAT, S.SUKUMARAN, SANJAY KUMAR AGARWAL, Sarla Chandra, SARY MITTER, SHOBHA DIXIT, SHRI PAL SINGH, SUSHIL JAIN, U.R.Lalit, V.M.TARKUNDE, V.N.GANPULE, VIJAY LAKSHMI MENON, VINA DEVI KHANNA, Y.S.Chitale

JUDGMENT

PATHAK, J. - Special leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated March 28, 1979 of the Patna High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellants. The history of this case records how an ambitious plan devised by the Central Government for accelerating and modernising agricultural development in the villages of India and simultaneously providing employment opportunities to engineers and technically trained personnel has come to grief because of an incomplete perception of the conditions necessary for its success and what seems to be an unfortunate want of determination at governmental level in the States, besides an attitude of banking institutions which, the petitioners say, is frustratingly clinical and wholly unsympathetic to the cause of the project. It is a tragedy in which an entire range of promises and assurances has been poured, but which seems defeated by the circumstance that an appropriate infrastructure has failed to develop. Those who are affected directly, a large number of individual entrepreneurs who involved themselves in the implementation of the scheme, found an inadequate response to the aspi















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top