SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 397

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.P.Sen : V.B.Eradi
Ziyathuge Noosa
Versus
Mavadigothi Mohammad
Case No. : 2244 of 1987
Date of Decision : 4/1/87
Advocates Appeared: Nambiyar A.S. : Rao G.N. : Vasudevan Shanta

Advocates:
A.S.NAMBIYAR, G.N.Rao, SHANTA VASUDEVAN

The court clarified the purpose of the notice and its impact on the present election.

Headnote:

ISSUE - notice - The court clarified that the notice was issued to settle the procedure for future elections and not to disturb the present election.

Fact of the Case:

The court issued a notice to settle the procedure for future elections without disturbing the present election.

Finding of the Court:

The court clarified the purpose of issuing the notice and emphasized that it was not intended to disrupt the present election.

Issues: Interpretation of the purpose of the notice and its impact on the present election.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the notice's purpose and its effect on the present election.

Final Decision: No stay was granted, and the notice was intended to settle the procedure for future elections.

(1) ISSUE notice. It is made clear that the purpose of issuing the notice is that to settle the procedure for election to the office of Village Moopan to be held in future and not to disturb the present election. No stay.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top