SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 477

A.P.SEN, B.C.RAY
Y. Suresh Babu – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


(1) SPECIAL leave granted. Learned counsel for the parties heard on the application made under S.320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for leave to compound the offence. The appellant has been convicted under s. 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. Although the offence under s.326 of the Code is non-compoundable, learned counsel for the parties submit that through the intervention of well-wishers the parties who are from the same locality have reconciled their differences to preserve amity and good relations. They pray for leave to compound the offence. The appellant stabbed D. Narsinga Rao, respondent no. 2. herein after an altercation near the pan shop owned by him. this was an unfortunate incident and the learned counsel for the appellant submits that his client has a feeling of remorse. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 also joins in the prayer for permission to compound the offence.

(2) TAKING an overall view of the facts and circumstances, we grant leave as a special case to the parties to compound the offence on condition that the appellant pays Rs. 10,000.00 to responde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top