A.P.SEN, B.C.RAY
Y. Suresh Babu – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent
(1) SPECIAL leave granted. Learned counsel for the parties heard on the application made under S.320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for leave to compound the offence. The appellant has been convicted under s. 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. Although the offence under s.326 of the Code is non-compoundable, learned counsel for the parties submit that through the intervention of well-wishers the parties who are from the same locality have reconciled their differences to preserve amity and good relations. They pray for leave to compound the offence. The appellant stabbed D. Narsinga Rao, respondent no. 2. herein after an altercation near the pan shop owned by him. this was an unfortunate incident and the learned counsel for the appellant submits that his client has a feeling of remorse. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 also joins in the prayer for permission to compound the offence.
(2) TAKING an overall view of the facts and circumstances, we grant leave as a special case to the parties to compound the offence on condition that the appellant pays Rs. 10,000.00 to responde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.