SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 510

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.C.Ray : Ranganath Misra : Sabyasachi Mukharjee
Sardar Prakash Singh Badal
Versus
Union Of India
Case No. : 3065 , 3263 , 3435 of 1986
Date of Decision : 5/7/87
Advocates Appeared: Banerjee M.K. : Bhushan Prashant : Bhushan Shanti : Grewal G.S. : Kumari Bhuvanesh : Kumari Bhuvnesh : Lokur Madan : Mattewal Hardev Singh : Parasaran K. : S R. : Singh Manjit : Sorabjee Soli J. : Thakur D.D. : Venugopal K.K.

Advocates:
Bhuvnesh Kumari, D.D.THAKUR, G.S.GREVAL, HARDEV SINGH, K.K.VENUGOPAL, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, M.K.BANERJI, MADAN LOKUR, Manjit Singh, Prashant Bhushan, R.S.NARULA, SHANTI BHUSHAN, SOLI J.SORABJI

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Special Leave - Interim order - This is a matter of importance and Court are of opinion that matter should be heard by a Constitution bench – Court report accordingly – Court are also satisfied that this is an urgent matter therefore parties will be at liberty to ask for a Constitution bench as early as possible and mention before learned chief justice of India - Let this matter appear on before chief justice of India for such directions as learned chief justice may Consider fit and necessary – Held, If any Presidential Poll takes place before hearing of this matter will be entitled to participate in the Precedential exercise their rights of Members as if they have not been disqualified as Members of Assembly - Save to above no other part of the order o High court is stayed - If petitioners so exercise their rights of voting pursuant to above then their votes may be separately marked and after counting kept separately until final disposal of the matter and appropriate directions be taken at time of hearing of this matter - Petition disposal of

(1) SPECIAL Leave granted. This is a matter of importance and we are of the opinion that the matter should be heard by a Constitution bench. We report accordingly. We are also satisfied that this is an urgent matter, therefore parties will be at liberty to ask for a Constitution bench as early as possible and mention before the learned chief justice of India. Let this matter appear on the 14/07/1987 before the chief justice of India for such directions as learned chief justice may Consider fit and necessary

(2) SO far as the interim order prayed in this application is concerned, the only aspect is the order of the Speaker dated 1/05/1987 notified on the 4/05/1987 in the official Gazette. We are not passing any order restraining the operation of the said order of the Speaker of that date except to the extent that Member of Punjab Assembly, who have been disqualified, if any Presidential Poll takes place before hearing of this matter, will be entitled to participate in the Precedential cise their rights of the Members, as if they have not been disqualified as Members of the Punjab Assembly. Save to the above, no other part of the order of the High court is stayed. If the petitioners so exercise their rights of voting pursuant to the above, then their votes may be separately marked and after counting kept separately until final disposal of the matter and appropriate directions be taken at the time of hearing of this matter. No other interim order. If the government files a Special Leave Petition, the same should come up for hearing with the above matter.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top