SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 142

A.N.SEN, P.N.BHAGWATI, R.S.PATHAK
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Coromandel Fertilizers LTD. – Respondent


(1) THE only question arising in these appeals relates to the exclusion of equalised freight. This question is already concluded in favour of the assessee by our judgment in Union of India v. Bombay Tyres International Ltd. [1984 (17) ELT 329 (S.C.)]. The appeal are, there fore, dismissed with no order as to costs. Of course, the actual amount of equalised freight which is eligible for exclusion will have to be deter- mined by the excise authorities if there is any dispute in,regard to it

(2) SPECIAL leave petitions are also dismissed since, the arising in these cases is concluded against the revenue by the above judment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top