SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 142

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.N.Sen : P.N.Bhagwati : R.S.Pathak
Union Of India
Versus
Coromandel Fertilizers Limited
Case No. : 307 , 310 of 1978
Date of Decision : 5/3/84

Act Referred

CENTRAL EXCISE ACT : S.4

Headnote

Appeal against conviction – Jurisdiction - question arising in these appeals relates to the exclusion of equalised freight. This question is already concluded in favour of the assessee by our judgment in Union of India v. Bombay Tyres International Ltd – Held, appeal are, there fore, dismissed with no order as to costs. Of course, the actual amount of equalised freight which is eligible for exclusion will have to be deter- mined by the excise authorities if there is any dispute in,regard to it - Special leave petitions are also dismissed since, the arising in these cases is concluded against the revenue by the above judgment – Petition dismissed

(1) THE only question arising in these appeals relates to the exclusion of equalised freight. This question is already concluded in favour of the assessee by our judgment in Union of India v. Bombay Tyres International Ltd. [1984 (17) ELT 329 (S.C.)]. The appeal are, there fore, dismissed with no order as to costs. Of course, the actual amount of equalised freight which is eligible for exclusion will have to be deter- mined by the excise authorities if there is any dispute in,regard to it

(2) SPECIAL leave petitions are also dismissed since, the arising in these cases is concluded against the revenue by the above judment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top