Back
1987 Supreme(SC) 26
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.L.Oza : O.Chinnappa Reddy
M.B.Patil
Versus
K.V.Patil
Case No. : 2004 of 1977
Date of Decision : 1/9/87
Headnote
Mysore Village Officers Abolition Act, 1961 – Claim of compensation – Jurisdiction - question involved in this case is whether a is also a holder of village office within the meaning of the definition of that expression in Mysore Village Officers Abolition Act, 1961 – Held, Karnataka High court has held that he is a holder of village office within the meaning of the definition and we see no reason to depart from the view taken by the Karnataka High court. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. No costs – Petition dismissed
(1) THE question involved in this case is whether a Watandar is also a holder of village office within the meaning of the definition of that expression in Mysore Village Officers Abolition Act, 1961. The Karnataka High court has held that he is a holder of village office within the meaning of the definition and we see no reason to depart from the view taken by the Karnataka High court. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. No costs.
(2) THE special leave petition is permitted to be withdrawn.
