SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 333

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Madan Lal – Appellant
Versus
M. P. State Road Transport Cor-poration, Bairagarh, Bhopal – Respondent


(1) IN this writ petition the petitioner has questioned the validity of a draft scheme bearing No. 75 dated 30/03/1973 published under Section 68-C of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the Madhya Pradesh Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) proposing to run its vehicles on the inter-State route Bhopal-Ajmer via Biaora-Kota to the exclusion of other operators. The scheme was approved by the State government under Section 68-D of the Act but it has not been published as it has not received the approval of the Rajasthan State government and the central government as yet. There is no satisfactory explanation given by the Corporation and the Madhya Pradesh State government as to why they have not been able to secure the approval of the Raiasthan government and of the central government. In the meanwhile the restrictions imposed by Ch. 4-A of the Act have been operative. We do not find that there is any justification to allow the scheme which has not yet been published under S. 68-D of the Act to continue to remain in force after nearly 13 years have elapsed. We, therefore, following the decision in Shri Chand v. Gov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top