SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 293

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, M.M.DUTT
Devki Nandan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


(1) WE have heard the learned, counsel lor the parties. In this writ petition the petitioner has questioned the validity of a draft scheme under S. 68-C of the Mutor Vehicles Act hereinafter referred to as the Act vide Notification No. E(4) (Plan) RSRTC/Transport/ 150 dated 30/03/1979 published in the Rajasthan Gazelle on 13/04/1979 in respect, of the routes Udaipur-Kelnada and Udaipur-Nathdwara. The said scheme has not yet been approved either with or without modification even though eight years have elapsed. We are not satisfied with the explanation tendered on behall of the Hearing Authority for not completing the proceedings during thnese eight years, Following the decision of this court in Shri Chana v. Government of U. P., Lucknow and in Phool Chand Gupta v. Regional Transport Authority, Ujjain we quash the draft scheme and issue a writ to the Authority hearing the matter under S. 68-D of tne Act not to proceed with tne hearing. We, however, make it clear that it is open to the State Transport Undertaking of Rajasthan to publish a fresh scheme, if it is so advised, in respect of the routes in question. If either the State Transport Undertaking or anybody else has been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top