SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 525

B.C.RAY, M.P.THAKKAR
Shree Hanuman Jute Mills – Appellant
Versus
Brij Kishore Kela – Respondent


(1) WE have perused the relevant record and heard counsel for the appellants in support of this appeal. The questions which are raised by the learned counsel are essentially questions of fact. In regard to these questions, we are in complete agreement with the reasoning of the High Court and the conclusion reached by the said court. We do not see any good reason to interfere with the finding recorded by the High Court on the questions of facts sought to be reagitated before this Court. The High Court has considered the matter carefully and recorded findings of facts which are fully supported by the evidence and has arrived at a just conclusion insofar as the grievances made by the appellants are concerned. The appeal, there- fore, fails and is dismissed with costs.

(2) WE are of the view that the appellants-plaintiffs grievance on one point is justified. Insofar as the other points which have been raised by the learned counsel for the appellants, we are of the view that the conclusion reached by the High Court is unexceptionable. We do not see any good reason to differ from. the view taken by the High Court. We entirely agree with the reasoning and conclusion of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top