B.C.RAY, M.P.THAKKAR
Shree Hanuman Jute Mills – Appellant
Versus
Brij Kishore Kela – Respondent
(1) WE have perused the relevant record and heard counsel for the appellants in support of this appeal. The questions which are raised by the learned counsel are essentially questions of fact. In regard to these questions, we are in complete agreement with the reasoning of the High Court and the conclusion reached by the said court. We do not see any good reason to interfere with the finding recorded by the High Court on the questions of facts sought to be reagitated before this Court. The High Court has considered the matter carefully and recorded findings of facts which are fully supported by the evidence and has arrived at a just conclusion insofar as the grievances made by the appellants are concerned. The appeal, there- fore, fails and is dismissed with costs.
(2) WE are of the view that the appellants-plaintiffs grievance on one point is justified. Insofar as the other points which have been raised by the learned counsel for the appellants, we are of the view that the conclusion reached by the High Court is unexceptionable. We do not see any good reason to differ from. the view taken by the High Court. We entirely agree with the reasoning and conclusion of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.