SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 105

B.C.RAY, G.L.OZA, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, RANGANATH MISRA, S.NATARAJAN, S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
A. R. Antulay – Appellant
Versus
R. S. Naik – Respondent


(1) THE only ground taken in the application is the absence of sanction under Sec. 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This involves consideration of an independent question and in the facts and circumstances of the case we de-link this special leave petition from the present Criminal Appeal No. 468/86 which we are dealing with. This special leave petition will come up for consideration before an appropriate Bench. Parties will be at liberty to mention before Honble the Chief Justice of India for an appropriate Bench after the disposal of Criminal Appeal.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top