RANGANATH MISRA, M.M.DUTT
Virendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti – Respondent
Judgment
M.M.DUTT, J.
(1) IN this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have prayed for issuance of the writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to compel the petitioners to take out licences and to pay market fee under the U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964, hereinafter referred to as the Act.
(2) THE petitioners are the producers of khandsari sugar and are the owners of Khandsari Sugar Units which they operate with the aid of power crushers for the production of khandsari sugar. The petitioners claim that as they are only producers of khandsari sugar, they are not liable to take out any licence or to pay the market fee under the Act as illegally demanded by the respondents Mandi Samitis.
(3) IT appears from the Preamble that the Act provides for the regulation of sale and purchase of agricultural produce and for the establishment, superintendence and control of market therefor in Uttar Pradesh. S. 5 of the Act provides for the declaration of intention of the State government to regulate and control sale. and purchase of agricultural produce in any area to be declared as a Market Ar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.